Monday, 13 April 2020

Personal Thoughts on PPE during the Coronavirus Pandemic


Personal thoughts on PPE during Coronavirus

I have received numerous requests and had many conversations with individuals and organisations about the use of PPE. It is hugely encouraging as a H&S professional to hear enthusiastic debate about such things as PPE being discussed in the wider media and community, however too often people will jump at the possibility of using or issuing PPE as the first option to control a risk, this is wrong. Let me explain why.

There is understandably some confusion about what PPE is and where and when it is to be used and a lack of clear understanding on what we should consider before issuing it. This is in no way a surprise or a criticism of those looking at the issue, there are not many community groups, parish councils or charity’s who have heard of, let alone considered, RPE FFP3 respirators. 

The starting point for identifying any suitable control measures is through a good assessment of the risk, being completed in a structured approach and usually being documented and regularly reviewed. Bearing in mind the minimal understanding we have of the virus and the rapidly changing information coming forwards it is imperative that any risk assessment must be reviewed and updated regularly to keep abreast of any such changes.

Risk Based approach; When thinking about your risk assessment, remember:

  • the hazard is anything that may cause harm; these can be hazards to physical health such as chemicals, electricity, working from ladders, an open drawer or to mental health – if, for example the common causes of work-related mental ill health e.g. demands, control and support for individuals are not properly managed in the workplace.
  • Clearly the Hazard under consideration here is C-19
  • the risk is the chance, high or low, that somebody could be harmed by these and other hazards, together with an indication of how serious the harm could be
  • Clearly the current Risk is High in relation to contracting C-19 from face to face contact with others who may be carrying the virus either knowingly or unknowingly and the potential consequence.

Having identified the hazard and ascertained the starting level of risk we would now need to consider how we manage that risk level down to its lowest practicable level in the environment we are considering. We can look at each end of the spectrum here, we could do nothing and leave the whole process down to chance and in the end hope to achieve herd immunity from C-19 or we could isolate every member of society in their homes for 6 months, or longer, to remove the chance of transmission completely. Neither of these are ‘reasonably practicable’ approaches so we must consider the controls we can put in place to reduce the risk to as low as reasonably possible. To do this we should be looking at the controls we might have to hand to protect us, our friends, family, staff, volunteers etc. Remember the hazard C-19, may only be one of the associated hazards to the activity your are assessing e.g. deliveries in your community during the pandemic may involve other hazards such as driving, traffic, slips trips and falls etc.

To control the risks, you should consider:

  • Removing the process or activity altogether or change it for a less hazardous process such as removing or reducing social contact to as low as is possible or exchanging cash payments to phone or contactless payments as an example.
  • Stop staff, visitors, customers etc accessing the hazardous activity, in this case contact with others. If it is not possible to remove all social contact e.g. in the case of supermarket employees, how can you reduce it to its absolute minimum, in the scenario here you could think about floor markings to enforce the 2m rule, changing processes to remove the need to break the 2m rule i.e. when one person holds a piece of equipment to allow another to access it, could you secure it mechanically removing the second person from the process. If you have situations where people usually come into close contact, such as small areas or rooms, can you limit the number of people entering at one time or place static protective screens in situ. Could you reduce contact by varying shift patterns, split in to two separate teams working at different times as an example.
  • Provide employees, volunteers, customers etc with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). But remember; PPE should only be used as a last resort when all other controls have been exhausted through the application of the hierarchy of controls.
  • Ensure you have adequate first-aid and welfare facilities available including soap, water and individual/single use towels.
  • Communicate with those at risk and consider their opinions and experience on control measures.

Personal Protective Equipment

When considering the correct PPE for the task and activity being undertaken there are a number of considerations we need to be thinking about. In some cases issuing PPE may actually create greater risks for the person we are trying to protect, so it is critically important that we understand what that piece of PPE is designed and capable of protecting us/them from and to consider what unintended consequences we might be bringing into the equation.

If we think about the known transmission routes of C-19 such as airborne particles or aerosols, being inhaled directly or hand to mouth/face transmission from contact with contaminated surfaces to mouth, nose and eyes we can see how putting things such as face masks or respiratory protective equipment (RPE) on and off our faces when the risk of aerosol transmission is very low, may well increase the risk to the face mask user simply by increasing the likelihood of hand to face contact. Front line staff, in most cases, are being issued with RPE with a face fit protection level 3 (FFP3), this is one the highest standards with FFP1/2 being lower protection. Again if we were to issue the FFP1 RPE the level of protection would be far below the standard required and may increase contamination risks rather than lower them. The risk maybe made greater through a misplaced belief that they are safer and therefore reduce personal social distancing because they have a face mask, albeit an ineffective one.

Face visors are a similar consideration, the updated UK Gov advice on the use of face visors suggest they should be used where aerosol generating procedures (AGP’s) are being conducted such as CPR where forced exhaled air from a patients lungs may produce large aerosols or bodily fluid that could make contact with the face of frontline staff. However if we consider someone working in a busy food takeaway scenario, where by definition most people are not likely to be symptomatic because the majority are following UK Gov advice and placing themselves and their families in isolation when they become symptomatic, they are unlikely to be exposed to AGP’s. Therefore we should consider the potential ‘increased risk’ in issuing face visors in this scenario if we were to issue it without making the decision on a clear risk based assessment. As an example, the risk maybe made greater in this scenario through staff sharing the visors or placing them on contaminated surfaces before use.

Other considerations to bear in mind when thinking about PPE are quality, are they CE Marked, could they cause a greater risk if the PPE is substandard or defective i.e. poorly made goggles that shatter on impact. The maintenance, storage and cleaning of PPE are also important considerations, what processes should be in place to ensure that facially worn PPE is not passed from one user to another either inadvertently or without a suitable and effective decontamination process in place.

Personal Protective Equipment is essential in protecting the health of those at risk but the process in deciding what to use or not to use is not as straight forward as some people I have been speaking with during this awful pandemic believe it is. I hope that this gives an insight into some of the considerations you could be thinking about and discussing with those at risk.

This is not specific guidance on the use of PPE and you should ensure that your risk assessment takes into account all reasonably foreseeable risks and hazards inherent in the activity you are assessing. The information here is only my personal opinion as a H&S professional and is not intended to be specific guidance in preventing any risk from contacting the C-19 virus or any other type of harm. The comment here is solely intended to provide some context around the decision making you might want to consider in preventing the spread of C-19 if you are being asked about providing or using PPE as a control  measure.

The best advice is to stay home, wash your hands for at least 20 seconds with soap and water regularly and maintain social distancing where ever possible.

Stay safe.

Hugo

Sources;




NOTE; References or information may change and the reader should check for any updates during this rapidly changing pandemic before making any safety critical decisions. 13/04/2020.

No comments:

Post a Comment